<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO News &#187; Google UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/tag/google-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest</link>
	<description>Intelligent Postioning (IP SEO)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:57:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bing slow at updating whilst Google enters new speed realm</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2010/03/bing-slow-at-updating-whilst-google-enters-new-speed-realm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2010/03/bing-slow-at-updating-whilst-google-enters-new-speed-realm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/?p=1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Back in May 2009 Bing’s Webmaster Spokesman told us that:
“We are busy adding upgraded and updated technologies to provide better search results. That’s good news for you!”
At the same time Google (when they weren’t messing around with their Geo-location searches) were working on their Google Real Time Search, which incorporates Twitter and blogging results.
It really [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1019" title="Screen shot 2010-03-02 at 14.11.11" src="http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/wp-content/uploads/Screen-shot-2010-03-02-at-14.11.11.png" alt="Screen shot 2010-03-02 at 14.11.11" width="85" height="42" /></p>
<p>Back in May 2009 Bing’s Webmaster Spokesman told us that:</p>
<p>“We are busy adding upgraded and updated technologies to provide better search results. That’s good news for you!”<span id="more-1015"></span></p>
<p>At the same time Google (when they weren’t messing around with their Geo-location searches) were working on their Google Real Time Search, which incorporates Twitter and blogging results.</p>
<p>It really is no surprise that Google’s share of the market is so much larger that Bing’s – they are simply much better.</p>
<h2>Google Real Time Search</h2>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1016" title="Screen shot 2010-03-02 at 12.46.34" src="http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/wp-content/uploads/Screen-shot-2010-03-02-at-12.46.34.png" alt="Screen shot 2010-03-02 at 12.46.34" width="704" height="487" /></p>
<p>This new addition is superb. Plus it seems to help with Google’s more up to date search results. As I show below.</p>
<h2>Google’s search is simply better than Bing</h2>
<p>Take a look at these two search results for “Cheryl Cole split”. This was a big news item last week and was being searched by 100,000s of people. A week on and people still crave the latest news.</p>
<p>In Google we have the latest news only a few hours old and targeted direct results for the exact topic I am looking for.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1017" title="Google Real Time search results" src="http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/wp-content/uploads/Screen-shot-2010-03-02-at-14.02.06.png" alt="Google Real Time search results" width="544" height="384" /></p>
<p>When the event took place last week and Cheryl Cole announced her split with Ashley, the SERPs were changing every few seconds. Not only was the Twitter and blog real-time feed going crazy, but the main pages offered in the SERPs were ever changing.</p>
<h2>Bing is not as good as Google</h2>
<p>Bing on the other hand is completely slow and offering inappropriate content. Here is the search today, 6 days after the event and still there is irrelevant content in the top positions.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1018" title="Bing Real Time search" src="http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/wp-content/uploads/Screen-shot-2010-03-02-at-14.07.38.png" alt="Bing Real Time search" width="588" height="386" /></p>
<p>In conclusion Bing really isn&#8217;t good enough and offers pretty awful results for a lot of searches. There is no real understanding of the searcher and thus no excitement or enthusiasm of the searcher to get more for his search.Bing is painfully slow at updating its results where as Google has entered a new area of speed searches with relevant quick results being offered a minute after they have been posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2010/03/bing-slow-at-updating-whilst-google-enters-new-speed-realm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google can&#8217;t find search results for Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/11/google-cant-find-search-results-for-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/11/google-cant-find-search-results-for-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Sector Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/?p=896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use my Google search bar to find even the most obvious URLs, it&#8217;s a lazy practice i know. So instead of typing in the full URL into the browser bar, i search one inch below for it then click. It actually probably takes longer. 
Anyway this morning I did this for &#8220;Yahoo&#8221; &#8211; lo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-899" title="Picture 2" src="http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/wp-content/uploads/Picture-2.png" alt="Picture 2" width="122" height="38" />I use my Google search bar to find even the most obvious URLs, it&#8217;s a lazy practice i know. So instead of typing in the full URL into the browser bar, i search one inch below for it then click. It actually probably takes longer. <span id="more-896"></span></p>
<p>Anyway this morning I did this for &#8220;Yahoo&#8221; &#8211; lo and behold Google couldn&#8217;t find any results for this search term.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-897" title="Yahoo search" src="http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/wp-content/uploads/Yahoo-search.png" alt="Yahoo search" width="724" height="426" /></p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t work on several colleagues machines, but did on others. Well it amused me. Is it to do with the Ajax results? </p>
<p>However, when you search on UK results it gives you millions of answers. Is this to do with the Google Geo search? Or Yahoo&#8217;s new localised redirect? Or just a glitch? </p>
<p>Yahoo seems to have implemented a redirect to http://m.uk.yahoo.com/ &#8211; which is new, and has only got a PageRank of 4. Google obviously doesn&#8217;t rate this page.</p>
<p>This needs more digging. </p>
<p>UPdate:<br />
Whilst doing a search on Bing for Yahoo, all seems fine. However my Stumbleupon toolbar gives it a category it probably shouldn&#8217;t be in. See below. Poor old Yahoo, what&#8217;s it done to annoy the other search engines?<br />
<img src="http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/wp-content/uploads/Picture-31.png" alt="Picture 3" title="Picture 3" width="825" height="378" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-905" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/11/google-cant-find-search-results-for-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
