<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Isn&#8217;t Google supposed to adhere to the canonical tag?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2010/01/isnt-google-suppose-to-adhere-to-the-canonical-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2010/01/isnt-google-suppose-to-adhere-to-the-canonical-tag/</link>
	<description>Intelligent Postioning (IP SEO)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:27:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2010/01/isnt-google-suppose-to-adhere-to-the-canonical-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-7074</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/?p=994#comment-7074</guid>
		<description>Good points Andy. 

So are you putting this down to a glitch? Google really has proved these last 12 months that it is not as all-knowing and all-seeing as Matt Cutts likes to make out. 

This is another serious issue, that is tells us SEOs to adhere to, but doesn&#039;t supply the results that it claims it should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Andy. </p>
<p>So are you putting this down to a glitch? Google really has proved these last 12 months that it is not as all-knowing and all-seeing as Matt Cutts likes to make out. </p>
<p>This is another serious issue, that is tells us SEOs to adhere to, but doesn&#8217;t supply the results that it claims it should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
