<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google UK SERPs changes are here to stay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/08/google-uk-serps-changes-are-here-to-stay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/08/google-uk-serps-changes-are-here-to-stay/</link>
	<description>Intelligent Postioning (IP SEO)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google UK SERPs update from Matt Cutts &#124; SEO News</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/08/google-uk-serps-changes-are-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-9436</link>
		<dc:creator>Google UK SERPs update from Matt Cutts &#124; SEO News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/?p=776#comment-9436</guid>
		<description>[...] Webmaster entry that discusses the state of Google&#8217;s UK SERPs. Back in June 2009 there was a major shake up in the Google UK that saw the inclusion of non relevant foreign websites that were ranking ahead of UK specific [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Webmaster entry that discusses the state of Google&#8217;s UK SERPs. Back in June 2009 there was a major shake up in the Google UK that saw the inclusion of non relevant foreign websites that were ranking ahead of UK specific [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Bing UK is out of BETA huh? &#124; SEO News</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/08/google-uk-serps-changes-are-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-6163</link>
		<dc:creator>So Bing UK is out of BETA huh? &#124; SEO News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/?p=776#comment-6163</guid>
		<description>[...] the &#8216;our results don&#8217;t contain non UK specific websites&#8217;, which is in relation to Google&#8217;s decision to weakend the Geo-filter in mid June.  This decision resulted in the SERPs being flooded by non-UK centred websites &#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the &#8216;our results don&#8217;t contain non UK specific websites&#8217;, which is in relation to Google&#8217;s decision to weakend the Geo-filter in mid June.  This decision resulted in the SERPs being flooded by non-UK centred websites &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Furious</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/08/google-uk-serps-changes-are-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-5992</link>
		<dc:creator>Furious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/?p=776#comment-5992</guid>
		<description>The point is not only annoying SEO. This directly affects balance of trade, elsewhere in Europe options exists for users to choose their own language. Here in the UK we are getting flooded with .com sites so that products from UK are constantly being pushed into UK only search. This shows how Google&#039;s near monopoly can be a very very dangerous service and have far larger repercussions than mere SEO moans. How does one make the DTi aware of this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is not only annoying SEO. This directly affects balance of trade, elsewhere in Europe options exists for users to choose their own language. Here in the UK we are getting flooded with .com sites so that products from UK are constantly being pushed into UK only search. This shows how Google&#8217;s near monopoly can be a very very dangerous service and have far larger repercussions than mere SEO moans. How does one make the DTi aware of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Has Google shot itself in the foot over UK SERPS? &#124; SEO News</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/08/google-uk-serps-changes-are-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-5300</link>
		<dc:creator>Has Google shot itself in the foot over UK SERPS? &#124; SEO News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 18:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/?p=776#comment-5300</guid>
		<description>[...] anyone in SEO knows, there has been a lot of debate and confusion about Google&#8217;s latest algortihm change (mostly confusion from Google that we have already posted about). In short, Google now offers up a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] anyone in SEO knows, there has been a lot of debate and confusion about Google&#8217;s latest algortihm change (mostly confusion from Google that we have already posted about). In short, Google now offers up a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/08/google-uk-serps-changes-are-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-4956</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/?p=776#comment-4956</guid>
		<description>There is something else going on here with Google. Cutts is not giving a straight answer. 

1) He just doesn&#039;t understand. He thinks that us Brits are moaning that there are .com results in our UK search. Which is ridicuous. Millions of UK sites have .com. That is not the problem.
2) They want us to do double the searches here until we get the right results.
3) It could be that they want US companies to perform better worldwide
4) The other point is that Google is not as clever as perhaps we think it is. 

Great Article Andy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something else going on here with Google. Cutts is not giving a straight answer. </p>
<p>1) He just doesn&#8217;t understand. He thinks that us Brits are moaning that there are .com results in our UK search. Which is ridicuous. Millions of UK sites have .com. That is not the problem.<br />
2) They want us to do double the searches here until we get the right results.<br />
3) It could be that they want US companies to perform better worldwide<br />
4) The other point is that Google is not as clever as perhaps we think it is. </p>
<p>Great Article Andy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/08/google-uk-serps-changes-are-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-4936</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/?p=776#comment-4936</guid>
		<description>Has he ever given a straight up answer in any of his videos........ever?

It would be interesting to see his response to that Texas camping example you gave. I am sure he would manage to swerve it with his typical politician&#039;s response though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has he ever given a straight up answer in any of his videos&#8230;&#8230;..ever?</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see his response to that Texas camping example you gave. I am sure he would manage to swerve it with his typical politician&#8217;s response though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
