Google UK SERPs changes are here to stay
I awoke this morning to a beautiful sunny day over here in the UK, picked up my iphone to check my tweets and found that Matt Cutts had completed a YouTube video regarding the changes made within Google UK since the start of June. I was indeed shocked and amazed that he even considered answering a question that had a number of SEO professionals suggesting that the SERPs were broken. The general conclusion to Matt’s video was that ‘yes there are more .com websites ranking within Google UK’ and ‘its all about relevancy of the search query’. I think Matt has chosen to side step the real issue at hand and question that was being asked by Guavarian – the inclusion of relevant .com websites isn’t a problem – the problem is that the searcher’s experience is being diminished due to the inclusion of non-UK focused websites.
The two examples he used – Tesco & Churchill – are enormous brands in the UK associated with Car Insurance, which you would expect to feature in the top twenty for the search term ‘Car Insurance’. The chart below highlights the movement since March 1st 2009 up to August 18th 2009 for the keyword term in question against those URLs.
Car Insurance movement in Google from March 1st 2009 to August 18th 2009
Not really ground breaking changes if you ask me. The two URLs featured in the top twenty prior to the algorithm change on June 6th anyway – and ‘earlier June’ was referred to in the initial question by Guavarian. So what do we take from this? The referral to two URLs, which are both hosted in the UK and featured prior to the change, indicates that either the question wasn’t fully understood OR, more likely, Mr Cutts decided to take a politician’s attitude towards the question. The quote below highlights the fence sitting attitude i’m talking about:
As we get better we’re more willing to show .com’s if we think that they’re really relevant to a given country.
I totally agree! Why shouldn’t a UK searcher buy Car Insurance from a German company that do not operate in the UK – which in this instance isn’t happening here. However, say you want to go off on a nice camping site trip, you could type the term ‘campsites’ into Google.co.uk:
Google UK SERPs for the term Campsites on 19th August 2009
As much I love traveling to the US I don’t know if I fancy going to Texas on a camping trip! So http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us is hosted in the US, doesn’t include ‘UK’ in the title (using the example Matt Cutts provided in his video) and is completely non-UK focused BUT appears on page one in Google UK for the keyword search term ‘Campsites’. There are a vast amount of backlinks from US hosted websites pointing to the website – so i’m finding it hard to see how or why this website is relevant to a UK audience?
Another example i’ve come across is for ‘Daily News‘ and yet again searching in the UK brings up ‘Tanzania Daily News’, ‘New York Daily News’ and ‘Sri Lanka Daily News’. Yes you may argue that ‘Daily News’ isn’t such a widely used term in the UK – however – I was quite surprised by this Google insights chart demonstrating the volume between ‘Daily News’ and ‘Local News’. 40% of the SERPs pages are in fact non-UK focused, so why would you continue to use that search term?
What I would have liked to have seen was a good quality honest answer that spoke about why, in some sectors, there is an influx of non-UK specific websites that ‘relate’ to the search query at hand. I thought it was a good honest question from Guavarian, which should have been met with a clearer answer. I believe competition is good – very good – and I do generally think that Google do try as best as they possibly can to serve up the most accurate results for the search term at hand, sadly the latest algorithm update hasn’t achieved this in some sectors.
August 20th, 2009 at 9:47 am
Has he ever given a straight up answer in any of his videos……..ever?
It would be interesting to see his response to that Texas camping example you gave. I am sure he would manage to swerve it with his typical politician’s response though.
August 21st, 2009 at 11:02 am
There is something else going on here with Google. Cutts is not giving a straight answer.
1) He just doesn’t understand. He thinks that us Brits are moaning that there are .com results in our UK search. Which is ridicuous. Millions of UK sites have .com. That is not the problem.
2) They want us to do double the searches here until we get the right results.
3) It could be that they want US companies to perform better worldwide
4) The other point is that Google is not as clever as perhaps we think it is.
Great Article Andy.
September 6th, 2009 at 7:40 pm
[...] anyone in SEO knows, there has been a lot of debate and confusion about Google’s latest algortihm change (mostly confusion from Google that we have already posted about). In short, Google now offers up a [...]
October 29th, 2009 at 11:29 am
The point is not only annoying SEO. This directly affects balance of trade, elsewhere in Europe options exists for users to choose their own language. Here in the UK we are getting flooded with .com sites so that products from UK are constantly being pushed into UK only search. This shows how Google’s near monopoly can be a very very dangerous service and have far larger repercussions than mere SEO moans. How does one make the DTi aware of this?
November 17th, 2009 at 6:21 pm
[...] the ‘our results don’t contain non UK specific websites’, which is in relation to Google’s decision to weakend the Geo-filter in mid June. This decision resulted in the SERPs being flooded by non-UK centred websites – [...]
April 30th, 2010 at 9:39 am
[...] Webmaster entry that discusses the state of Google’s UK SERPs. Back in June 2009 there was a major shake up in the Google UK that saw the inclusion of non relevant foreign websites that were ranking ahead of UK specific [...]