<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Long Tail Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/02/the-long-tail-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/02/the-long-tail-search/</link>
	<description>Intelligent Postioning (IP SEO)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:27:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sue C</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/2009/02/the-long-tail-search/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-seo.com/latest/?p=366#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff - so should the short tail be ignored to start off with? If there is more benefit from the long tail - then the short tail can look after it&#039;s self, or should we still concentrate on the short tail with the hope the long tail will fall into place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff &#8211; so should the short tail be ignored to start off with? If there is more benefit from the long tail &#8211; then the short tail can look after it&#8217;s self, or should we still concentrate on the short tail with the hope the long tail will fall into place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
